
The
Philadelphia Society of Small Streets (PSSS)
JOIN
OUR MEETUP
for latest news & events
The Philadelphia Society of Small Streets (PSSS) is
a collaborative effort to improve our small historic streets.
Philadelphia has had a historic street district restoration program (Philadelphia
Historic Street Paving Thematic District)
since 1999, but thus far only 12 small streets have been restored. That is an
extremely small number considering that there are over 200 streets on the
restoration list. As a result, some of Philadelphia's small historically
designated streets are now very unsafe streets for pedestrians and vehicles
alike.
In
particular, PSSS has asked city officials to restore the following streets due
to their historic importance and popularity, yet clearly “unsafe” condition:
-
200 block of Quince
Street
-
2400 block of Panama
Street
-
200 block of
Hutchinson Street, plus intersecting Manning Street and Bonaparte Court
The
harsh reality is, the Streets Department is choosing not to restore
historic streets because they are more costly to resurface than asphalt
streets. That fact will never change, so what does it mean for the future of
the program? We should point out that restoring historic streets does
not have to be as expensive as it is. Much of the increased cost is because
the Streets Department requires an 8-12" concrete foundation under these
historic cartways, something that PSSS has opposed for a variety of reasons (see
below). State funds have been made available for the restoration of large
historic streets, but not Philadelphia's small streets.
Under the present
circumstances, our
advice to residents is to organize your own campaign to restore your street:
call, email, write lots of letters, do petitions, and ask for meetings with
the list of government officials below. We will assist you as much as
possible. However, it is up to you to be persistent in the pursuit of the
restoration of your own small historic streets.
CONTACT:
James.Kenney@phila.gov (Mayor
of Philadelphia)
Mark.Squilla@phila.gov
(Chair of Streets Committee on City Council)
Carlton.Williams@phila.gov
(Streets Commissioner)
Stephen.Lorenz@phila.gov
(Chief Engineer, Historic Streets)
Jon.Farnham@phila.gov
(Executive Director of Philadelphia Historical Commission)
We have
several "historic street" issues that we work on with Councilman Mark
Squilla (Chair of the Street Committee), the Streets Department, and the
Historical Commission. See
SUMMARY below. In order to be on the list
for the
Philadelphia Historic Street Paving Thematic District, the street must
not be paved over.
Here is also a
map of the historic streets. PSSS does not limit our
activities to designated streets only. We will support efforts to reclaim
paved historic streets, as well. In fact, the Streets Department has
indicated that it will consider approving plans to restore asphalted
streets if the costs are covered privately. Below are lots of links
and information. Please take the time to review. We greatly
appreciate your participation, comments, and questions.
Lynn and Cliff Landes, Founders
The Philadelphia Society of Small Streets (PSSS)
http://www.smallstreetsphilly.org
http://www.meetup.com/The-Philadelphia-Society-of-Small-Streets-PSSS
LynnLandes@gmail.com /
215-629-3553
"RESTORED" HISTORIC STREET LIST:
since 1999
-
Camac Street (200 block, has been restored
at least twice, now asphalted pending another restoration)
-
N. Water Street, off of Callowhill (date
uncertain)
-
Panama Street, 2500 block (2010 or 2011)
-
Jessup Street, 200 block (2012)
-
Warnock Street, 200 block (2012)
-
Panama Street, 1200 block (2012)
-
Cypress Street, 1200 block (2012)
-
American Street, 300 block (2017)
-
Philip Street, 300 block (2018)
-
need confirmation on:
-
Fulton Street, 200 block
-
Chancellor Street, 1200 block
-
St. James Streets, 1200 block
PSSS NEWS & LETTERS!
SUMMARY OF
THINGS THAT NEED TO BE DONE!
Briefly,
we would like the Philadelphia Streets Department to do the following:
- RESTORATION
PRIORITY LIST: Give priority on first restoring historic streets
that are lined with historic homes in the historic districts, starting
in Old City and Center City, then radiate outward, rather than select
back alleys, new construction, and remote locations, which has occurred
in the past.
(PSSS
Suggested Restoration Priority Street List Report)
- Quince Street, 200 block
- Panama Street, 2400 block
- Hutchinson Street cluster, 200 block,
plus intersecting Bonaparte Court & Manning Street
- PLUMBERS'
PATCHES: Put an end to "Plumbers' Patches" on historic streets-
SEE PHOTOS.
Currently, contractors can fill their trenches on historic streets with
asphalt and concrete, which defeats the purpose of the restoration
program and leaves behind an unsightly mess that lasts for years, if not
decades. We want contractors to be required to properly & promptly
reset the street pavers that they excavate.
-
DEVELOPERS:
Require developers to restore onsite or adjacent historic streets as
part of their approval process by the city.
-
FOUNDATIONS:
Use "modified aggregate and screening" for street foundations and
filler, not “concrete foundations and mortar”, which presents a myriad
of problems for homeowners and their contractors. Historic pavers were
originally designed to be picked up and placed back down again. It
made sense then and it makes sense now.
(more detail below)
-
SIDEWALK GRADIENT
(i.e, slope): The restoration
of historic streets should include in the bid contract a requirement
that all sidewalk gradients be in compliance with
Street Department standard of 1/4 inch slope per foot, and if
such is not the case, curbs should be reset to be in compliance with
that standard.
-
SPACING, SMOOTHNESS, & ADA COMPLIANCE: The bricks and stones should
be tightly set, and in some cases, stone pavers should be ground smooth
in order to make walking and biking safe and easy, and to be compliant
with The Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA). See
NYC
Historic Districts Council
shares
these concerns in a report:
- CAMAC "THE
WOOD" STREET: Remove the concrete foundation under Camac "The
Wood" Street, so that the street can drain properly, plus experiment
with more water resistant tree species for the wood blocks, such as
Black Locust or Osage Orange,
and a local Cedar or Cypress. See
http://www.smallstreetsphilly.org/WoodStreets.htm
-
GREEN STREETS
PROGRAM: Revise the current construction design of the "Green
Streets" program, which uses toxic materials and is of questionable
design, including virtual cisterns and thin plastic liners that are
destined to leak and impact adjacent buildings
-
SNOW REMOVAL: For heavy snow storms
and small streets, we have suggested for years that the City Code be
modified to instruct residents to shovel the street and a path to the
front door, not the sidewalk. So far, no luck with City Hall on this
matter. People still shovel the snow into the small streets blocking the
way for cars, trucks, and emergency vehicles.
-
WEEDING: Use 5%
undiluted household vinegar, not toxic herbicides.
(SCROLL DOWN TO READ MORE DETAILED INFO BELOW)
TOP 7 PSSS PROPOSALS:
1.
RESTORATION PRIORITY LIST:
Also see May 13, 2015 -
PSSS Suggested Restoration Priority Street List
-
Location:
Begin restorations with in the center of the city and its historic
districts and then radiate outwards.
-
Context:
Select streets that are lined with historic homes, not back alleys, side
streets, and new construction.
-
Condition:
Target streets that are in urgent need of repair and restoration.
-
Logistics:
Restore streets in geographic clusters when at all possible.
2. PREFERRED
CONSTRUCTION DESIGN
Modified aggregate topped with sand then pavers
(see
Case Against Concrete)
Currently, the Streets Department is using 8-12 inches of concrete as a
base. We want them to use something similar to the Netherland's model
(see
http://tiger-stone.com/) of the
following:
·
NETHERLAND'S ROAD
FOUNDATION: 15 inches of pulverized concrete (although we prefer
"modified aggregate"), on top, 2-6 inches of sand of good quality, not
like the sand on a beach, (we prefer "screening"), rather than the
Streets Dept current standard of an 8-12 inch concrete base and mortar.
(the emphasis in the email using highlighting, underlining, and bold
print is ours) See Tiger-Stone's email
to us.
·
SPACING, SMOOTHNESS, & ADA COMPLIANCE: The bricks and stones should
be tightly set, and in some cases, stone pavers should be ground smooth
in order to make walking and biking safe and easy, and to be compliant
with The Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA). See
NYC
Historic Districts Council
shares
these concerns in a report
and NYT
article:
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/30/nyregion/time-is-past-for-many-of-citys-old-cobblestones.html?pagewanted=all&_r=1
or (doc)
·
SIDEWALK GRADIENT
(i.e, slope): The restoration of historic streets should include in
the bid contract a requirement that all sidewalk gradients be in
compliance with Street Department standard of 1/4 inch per foot, and if
such is not the case, curbs should be reset to be in compliance with
that standard.
3.
PLUMBERS PATCHES
SEE PHOTOS:
These are an unnecessary waste of the city's time, money, and effort.
Historic pavers are designed to be picked up and placed back down again.
Currently, contractors can fill their ditches on historic streets with
asphalt, leaving behind an unsafe and unsightly mess for the city to clean
up. Contractors who dig into city streets should be required to put the
street back as they found it (historic or not). This is more easily
done on historic streets if contractors don't have to drill through a
concrete foundation.
UPDATE 1/15/16 (Unfortunately,
the following program still allows for plumbers patches).
MAY 2014:
Good news. One of our main goals is to
stop unsightly "plumbers patches". A pilot program to allow homeowners to
contract historic street restorations through their plumbing contractors
will run from July to December 2014. Residents will save $450 on
their permits. Previously, plumbers felt that they had to pour an asphalt
or concrete patch. Homeowners had to wait years for the city to get around
to restoring the patch, which rarely occurred. Now, homeowners have the
option to contract for the restoration work to be done immediately.
So, congratulations to everyone. We think that this is a good first step
toward putting an end to unsightly "plumbers patches", and it wouldn't
have happened without your support. Thank you! Now we need to put an
end to plumbers patches permanently. They are blighting our
community and wasting taxpayers dollars. What's the point of restoring a
historic street if the very next week a contractor can pour a plumbers
patch, as happened with the newly restored 200 block of Warnock Street in
2012!
4. HISTORIC CURB CONSERVATION:
Currently, the Historical Commission only has control over the flat
surface of these historic streets. Historic curbs should be protected as
they are integral to the structural design of historic streets.
5. SIDEWALK
RESTORATION:
We
strongly advise residents with substandard or concrete sidewalks to
consider restoring them with historic brick. We and four of our
neighbors did that in 2012 when our street was restored and it has made
the street look beautiful and very historically authentic. We got
our bricks from
http://www.phillyprovenance.com/.
In our experience (the 2012 Jessup / Cypress / Panama / Warnock Streets
restoration), where the contractor needed to remove bricks and sidewalks
in order to restore the street, the contractor also put them back, at no
expense to the homeowner. That is clearly the situation on Philip
Street. The collapse of the street has caused the collapse of the
sidewalk. However, if the sidewalks and curbs (including driveway
"curb-cuts") were already in bad shape, and not caused by the street, then
the homeowner 'could' (not necessarily 'would') get charged for any
repairs made by the contractor. In 2012, at first the Streets
Department said that residents needed to hire their own contractors.
But then they relented, in that the logistics and logic of the situation
called for the on-site contractor to make any additional repairs
individual property owners would require. We can't give any
guarantees that this will be the policy going forward, but that was our
experience.
6. WEED STREETS
SAFELY!
The
best thing to do is to use a watering can to saturate the plant matter
with 5% undiluted household vinegar that you can purchase at many grocery
stores. Apply in the evening when there is no prediction of rain for
a few days. It takes about 3-5 days to see the final results.
Re-apply as necessary. Most commercial herbicides are toxic to people and
the planet.
7.
SNOW REMOVAL AND CITY CODE: 2016 PSSS emails to Mayor Kenney -
http://www.smallstreetsphilly.org/MayorKenney&SnowRemoval.htm
Although the Streets Department directs property owners to
shovel snow from their sidewalks, 6.5 wide streets are allowed to do
things differently. Please read below our advice for snow removal.
This is a HEALTH & SAFETY issue, as emergency vehicles must be able to
access our small streets!
For heavy snow storms and
small approximately 6-7 foot wide streets - SHOVEL THE STREET, NOT THE
SIDEWALK!
We first shovel the street and a
path to our door, then do the sidewalk - if there's room to put the snow.
Although it's in violation of city code, the Streets Department says that
it is okay for streets that are 6-7 feet wide. Logistically, it’s about
the same amount of area to be shoveled. Even for streets that are 12 feet
wide, residents also have to shovel out their cars, so it still comes to
about the same area.
Also, don't forget to clear debris from your
sidewalks, curbs, and particularly storm
drain grates before any major snow or rain event. Otherwise
you risk flooding your street.
Right way
(left) and wrong way (right), See all 16 PHOTOS (2014 winter) on our
meetup page -
http://www.meetup.com/The-Philadelphia-Society-of-Small-Streets-PSSS/photos/25930321/434622333/#434622889.


(We
have expressed our concerns about this situation to the Streets Department
for several years now. See: 2010 Philadelphia Inquirer article:
http://articles.philly.com/2010-02-12/news/25219452_1_shovel-sidewalk-jessup-neighbors/)
This is a matter of health and safety.
We must have a timely way to allow for emergency vehicles, residents'
vehicles, and pedestrian traffic on our small streets after a snow event,
therefore:
For property owners on small streets measuring approximately 6.5 feet
wide, we ask that the CITY CODE be amended to direct those property
owners to shovel snow from their half of the street (to the center line,
approximately 3 1/4 feet) in front of their house, plus a 3 foot wide path
to their doors. Currently, all property owners are required to shovel a 3
foot path on their sidewalk.
The advantages of the PSSS
suggested method:
• requires minimal additional effort on the part of property
owners • frees up the sidewalk to hold the cleared snow, particularly
critical to small streets in heavy snow events • gives property owners
the responsibility to clear the snow in a time manner, thereby allowing
for foot & car traffic, and the disabled • saves tax dollars by
relieving the Streets Department of the responsibility of clearing snow
from hundreds of small streets (6.5' wide)
Disadvantages of
current City Code for small streets:
• City Code is contradictory and unworkable for heavy snow
conditions. Residents are required not only to clear a 36-inch path of
snow from their sidewalks, but also not put any snow into the street. For
small streets and big snow events, this is an impossible requirement to
comply with, offering no place to hold the snow. • Most residents put
priority of removing the snow from their sidewalks, and throw the snow
into the streets, thereby blocking their streets with several feet of snow
and creating a safety and fire hazard.
February 2015:
Recently, we were told by the Streets Department that it is too difficult
to change the City Code, but that residents of small streets will not be
ticketed if our sidewalks are not cleared. Unfortunately, this policy
leaves 'both our sidewalks and streets clogged with snow' until City snow
removal equipment arrives, which it often doesn't. At least for the sake
of the disabled and pedestrian traffic, small street residents should be
subject to the same snow removal requirements as other city property
owners. We are just asking for a different location - instead of
shoveling the sidewalk, shovel the street. The area to be cleared is
almost exactly the same.
Please contact Councilman Mark Squilla and Streets Commissioner Keith
Warren and ask that the City Code be amended as we suggest above.
Mark.Squilla@phila.gov
(Chair of Streets Committee on City Council)
Keith.Warren@phila.gov
(Streets Commissioner)
Jan 2015: Snow,
salt, streets, and electrocuting dogs:
This is slightly off-topic. There was a problem last year with dogs
getting electrocuted, mainly at some cross walks. It appears that
the snow/water/ice and salt combined with underground electric current,
causes dogs to get electrocuted. People with rubber shoes don't feel
it, usually. We and several others called PECO and Streets.
Supposedly, the problem was fixed. However, we can still detect
current with our EMF monitor, so we'll see. (Jan 2015)
LASTLY, just wanted to add
that we use a floor-grade squeegee, like the one below, to remove snow
from our street and sidewalk. It works great!

OTHER ISSUES:
-
Accidental paving:
The Streets Department should check first with the Historical Commission
that a street is not designated part of the historic cartway before
crews pave it.
-
Private financing:
There should be an official protocol in place for residents to contract
out to reclaim their streets with either their own funds or through
grants. At the current rate of repair, it will be 70 years before all
the streets are fixed.
April 2014:Good news! The Streets
Department has indicated that it will consider allowing private
financing, although an official policy is not yet in place. Residents
should contact the Streets Commissioner directly if their want to pursue
this course of action.
-
Public information:
April 2014: Good news! The PHC has put more
information online (see Gov't Doc Links at top), although we (PSSS)
still have links to more information that the PHC, such as a map of the
historic streets.
-
Public meetings and
input:
This should be standard practice. Public meetings should take place in a
timely manner on which streets get restored, how, and in what order.
April 2014: Good news! Last year (2013)
the Streets Department did contract out a survey of all the historic
streets. And in April the Streets Department met with our
organization. It was a very satisfying experience. More work
to do, of course...
-
Resident crews:
The Streets Department should consider certifying residents to do their
own minor street repairs.
-
Weight limit:
There should be a posted signs with a weight limit for heavy vehicles.
The case
AGAINST "concrete foundation & mortar" and FOR “modified
aggregate and screening”:
CONCRETE FOUNDATION
CONS |
MODIFIED AGGREGATE FOUNDATION
PROS |
|
|
FOR REPAIRS:
|
|
Structural risks from vibration:
makes it extremely difficult to
access underground utilities for repair or installation, plus
jackhammers and other heavy equipment can cause damage by vibration to
nearby underground utilities, adjacent buildings, and historic
structures. |
pavers, aggregate, and screening can
be easily removed and reset by hand or using light equipment
|
Creating future
problems:
after spot excavation work is complete, concrete chunks usually
get thrown back into plumbers ditches by the contractor, thereby
creating future subsidence problems
|
aggregate is easy to remove and put
back in place |
Concealing problems: concrete
conceals any "subsidence" issues beneath the pavers until they become
catastrophic |
pavers serve as a vital
"early warning system" for
dangerous subsidence issues below, as they slowly begin to collapse
into any hole developing under the street or sidewalk due to leaks in
plumbing or other causes |
Pedestrian unfriendly: mortar,
of the required ¼ to ½ inch-span between pavers, can make walking or
biking over pavers very difficult - as in reality it is often 1inch or
more. |
tightly-fitted pavers with minimal
screening between them makes walking or biking a safer experience
|
Esthetics: concrete and mortar
cannot be repaired without looking like a patch-work quilt, as the
visual difference between old and new mortar will be obvious and
unsightly |
simply lifting up and resetting
pavers, properly, will leave no evidence of a repair
|
|
|
FOR PERMEABILITY:
|
|
None: prevents any road surface
permeability for rainwater, thus increases storm water run-off and icy
conditions in the winter |
allows for slow permeability which
keeps streets drier and safer in icy conditions, although storm drains
are still necessary for stormwater runoff |
Creates drainage problems:
creates a subsurface barrier that would trap rain water between the
road and adjacent buildings, resulting in wet basements |
allows for slow permeability |
Damages pavers:
creates a wet environment which is
particularly harmful for wood and brick pavers, as well as stone.
Camac Street, The Wood Street, between Walnut and Locust completely
rotted away due to concrete foundation under a sand layer, as well as
the type of wood. Black locust, Osage Orange, or another
water-tolerant species of tree should be used or at least experimented
with.
|
creates a dry environment which
better protects pavers |
Increases Health & Safety concerns:
creates conditions that breed
MOSQUITOES |
allows slow permeability worsens
conditions for mosquitoes |
|
|
VARIOUS RESTORATION REPORTS AND EXAMPLES:
-
Netherlands: TigerStone
http://tiger-stone.com/
(paver installation company). From a Tiger-Stone representative, "In the
Netherlands we use 15 inches of concrete debris ( pulverized concrete)
and on top 2 to 6 inches of sand ( of good quality, not like the sand on
a beach…) In a lot of countries the use stabilized sand, this is a
mixture with cement. The most important is that the base construction
is solid so in the long term the road quality can be guarantied. We
use sand on the last few inches because the ‘’old’’ stones are not
likely to al have the same dimensions. The sand does have the compacted
with a compacting plate before paving the stones."
-
DUBLIN, IRELAND: PAVING THE CONSERVATION OF HISTORIC GROUND SURFACES
-
From Davenport,
Iowa: "We generally use six inches of 95% proctor compacted ¾” down
(with fines) crushed stone material for the base, with about 1” of sand
on top of that. We vibrate the bricks into the sand, then sweep more
sand over the top and vibrate again to get the sand to fill the gaps
between the bricks. On hills we mix in 1 part mortar to 3 parts sand to
prevent the sand mixture from washing away."
-
From Willmette,
Illinois: "This work shall consist of removing existing bricks in
streets at various locations determined by the ENGINEER; removal of the
existing deteriorated stone base to a depth of 6 inches, placement of a
new 6 inch CA 6 base (CA is crushed aggregate), a 1 inch sand layer and
replacement of the bricks."
-
Brick Pavement
Repairs, 6 inch Stone Base: used for brick repairs , with settlement
-
Brick Pavement
Repairs, 13 inch Stone Base: used for brick repairs , with a lot of
settlement
-
Portland, Oregon:
http://www.portlandoregon.gov/bes/article/7...
Streets are excavated to full depth, about 13 to 18 inches below top of
curb. Drainage geotextile fabric is placed on the ground surface, and a
layer of 2”-minus rock drainage blanket 6-10 inches deep is laid on top
of the fabric and compacted. ... The permeable pavers are then installed
on the leveling bed. The space between paving blocks is filled with the
fine rock, and rock and pavers are compacted. (Lynn Landes: We
don't agree with using geotextile fabric as it interferes with
excavation for repairs, and also interferes with subsidence, which acts
as an early warning system for the formation of catastrophic sinkholes.)
MORE ON HISTORIC RESTORATIONS:
- 200 block of Jessup Street, Philadelphia:
Historic Assessment and Recommendation Report:
October 2010, 200 block of South Jessup Street by Milner + Carr
Conservation. Jessup Street was restored in 2012. The
results of the work done was somewhat predictable, as the Streets
Department insisted on laying a concrete base against the report's
recommendation of modified aggregate for the foundation. In general, the
restored streets by contractor Spaventa & Sons (http://dspaventa.com),
look great (200 blocks of Jessup and Warnock, 1300 blocks of Cypress and
Panama). However, the mortar between the bricks is crumbling in some
places, the streets are not porous and are therefore holding water, and
the Belgium blocks are placed too far apart for safe and comfortable
walking and riding (in cars or on bikes). On Jessup Street there is a
new crack straight across the road just next to our house (217),
breaking one of our old granite gutter stone in half. We believe that
the crack is the result of the concrete being laid in one continuous
stretch and encompassing all the street elements, not allowing for any
breaks and therefore no 'give'. That said, the restored historic streets
look really good.
-
Nantucket's Cobble Streets Timeline
- Washington Place, Troy, NY:
- O & P Streets, Georgetown, DC:
"The Green Street "program:
LINKS:
CONCERNS:
-
asphalt is a toxic material and
not "green" in any meaningful sense
-
http://www.nature.nps.gov/hazardssafety/toxic/asphalt.pdf
-
asphalt also presents many of the same
problems presented by concrete - see above
-
The Percy Street model creates a
cistern under the streets, using clean stones and lined on
either side of the road with plastic, that they claim will protect
nearby basements from water damage. However, we are concern that
it is a fatally flawed design concept. Typically plastic liners,
even landfill liners, are only 1/10 of an inch thick and are vulnerable
to cracking and breaking due to heat and cold, wear and tear.
Our preliminary research shows that
buried "impermeable" plastic liners only last from 15-20 years. Not good
news for homeowners.
http://www.gfredlee.com/Landfills/SubtitleDFlawedTechnPap.pdf
-
according to the video above, the Percy
Street model seems to discourage use of trees on small streets
-
Pete Riley, Design Unit, Philadelphia
Water Department may be a good person to contact for addition
information
REPORT MAJOR
SUBSIDENCE AND/OR POTHOLES TO 311:
If you have a safety hazard, you should immediately notify the Streets
Department -
http://www.phila.gov/311/form/Pages/default.aspx or
call 3-1-1 (215-686-8686) Save the reference number if you need to
follow-up. Always state on the form if your street is historically
designated, part of the Philadelphia Historic Street Paving Thematic
District, and therefore asphalt should not be used. An inspector
will be sent out. Often the Water Department needs to get involved.
Follow up with them at
http://www.phila.gov/water/aboutus/Pages/ContactUs.aspx -
using the General Inquiries number (215-685-6300) and speak with a
representative, who should also give you a tracking number. Other
utilities might also get involved. Just keep following up with the
various entities until the complaint is fixed. Tenacity is often required.
You can also contact PSSS and we will assist you. Our contact
information is at bottom of this page.
A Brief History of:
Commercial Old City ... Small Streets
by Carol Moore
http://www.oldcitydistrict.org/discover/a-brief-history-of5
OTHER RESOURCES--
Small Streets
Phil
LaCombe, Director and Co-Founder email: phil@smallstreets.org web:
http://smallstreets.org
mobile: 413.648.7445
Paul Daniel Marriott &
Associates
3140 Wisconsin Avenue,
NW Suite 804 Washington, DC 20016 info@historicroads.org
http://www.historicroads.org
Links and information for maintenance and construction:
Contractors for
restoring sidewalks and streets as recommended by PSSS members:
-
Olivieri and Associates Inc.
http://www.olivieriandassoc.com/ (Philip Street restoration
contractors, 2018)
-
Spaventa & Sons (http://dspaventa.com)
(Jessup, Warnock, Panama, and Cypress Streets, 2012)
-
Artistic Masonry
610-931-1375 cyock74@hotmail.com
-
Daniel Monroy 215
888 8471
PHILLY GOV'T LINKS:
(Unfortunately, there is not one repository for information about
Philadelphia's historically certified streets, as the Historical
Commission and the Streets Department post some, but not all the resources
available.)
- To add a
street to the "Philadelphia Historic Street District": Call
the Philadelphia Historical Commission at 215-686-7660. Address: One
Parkway, 13th floor, 1515 Arch Street, Philadelphia, PA 19102
/ Website: http://www.phila.gov/historical/Pages/default.aspx
- Philadelphia Streets Department's
"Historical Streets" http://www.philadelphiastreets.com/highways/historic-streets/
- Philadelphia Historic Districts, scroll
down to "Historic Street Paving": http://www.phila.gov/historical/register/Pages/districts.aspx (drop
down menu provides the following 2 documents)
-
Historic Streets List (find out
if a street is certified historic, might not be up-to-date): https://www.phila.gov/media/20190213131359/Thematic-District-Street-Paving.pdf
- Dec 1,1998, Report of the Historic
Designation Committee (our
link, could not find document online)
- Dec. 9, 1998, Official
nomination: http://www.phila.gov/historical/PDF/Histori...
-
Historic Streets Map - http://phl.maps.arcgis.com/apps/View/index.html?appid=0a0b23447b6b4f7097d59c580b9045fe
- STREETS TO BE REMOVED FROM and
ADDED TO LIST: http://www.phila.gov/historical/Documents/Amendment%20to%20Historic%20Street%20Paving%20District%202014.pdf
- Civic Groups Map: http://gsg.phila.gov/map#id=fa011ca0d2df46b0acb9ed35537dca21 (helps
locate local civic groups for historic streets)
- Jan 2015: The Streets Department's
Historic Streets Assessment Report http://www.philadelphiastreets.com/images/uploads/documents/Historic_Streets_Assessment_Report.pdf
- Historic Streets Plumbers' Ditch
Restoration Pilot (ends Dec 2014) http://www.philadelphiastreets.com/highways/historic-streets/historic-streets-plumbers-ditch-restoration-pilot/
Lynn and Cliff Landes, founders The Philadelphia Society of Small
Streets (PSSS)
http://www.smallstreetsphilly.org/
http://www.meetup.com/The-Philadelphia-Society-of-Small-Streets-PSSS/
217 S. Jessup Street Philadelphia, PA 19107
LynnLandes@gmail.com
215-629-3553
www.LynnLandes.com
|